Report of the discussion

Topic : Introduction of extracyrrucykar  physical education.

Supporters
・Kazuko : She is a staff of Japan physical education assessment.
・Yuta : He is a junior high school student.

Opponents
・Yoshiko : She has a son who go the school.
・Manabu : He is a staff of educational company.
・Takao : He teaches math at the school.

Supporters opinions
・The physical strength of students are very low, so they should build up.
・Building up their physical strength will bring tenacity and children's brains will activate.
・The decline of children's strength has a possibility of illness or injuries.

Oppoment' opinions
・Hard exercise makes children tired and they may be not able to center on studying.
・If children exercise at early morning, it is trouble for children and their mother to get up early. And winter morning is dark and danger.

The outcome of the discussion
・They exercise three days for a week.
・Children make groups and go school together.
・Students preparing for an examination don't take part in.
・Children take a rest before class.

How effective I thought the discussion was and how it could have been better
I didn't know why the physical strength of students are very low, so they should explain that.

Report of the discussion 8

Topic: Lowering the age  for voting to 16.

Supporters
・Ryuji : He is a fire man. He is 20.
・Koyama: He is a mayor of the city.

Opponents
・Mio : She is 16 and a high school student.
・Tikako : She is 20 and a college student.

Supporter's opinions
・There are some new adults who drink and make noise at coming-of-age ceremony every year. If 16 years old people get voting right, they will get feeling of responsibility.
・There are many people who are 16 years old and work at society. They should have the voting right.

Opponent's opinions
・16 years old is too young to have the voting right. There is a possibility that irresponsible votes increase.
・They don't have enough knowledge about the society.

The outcome of the discussion
They are going to put into effect three years later. They are going to teach about society at high school.

My opinion
I don't think that there is no relation between actions that new adults do at coming-of-age ceremony and having the voting right. So I don't think their plan is effective.

How effective I thought the discussion was and how it could have been better.
I thought they should speak more loud voice

Report of the discussion 7

Topic: The merger of two school, Sakura school and Momizi school

Oppoments
Makiko: Her son goes to Sakura school.
Kenta: He was a sutudent of Sakura school.

Supporters
Jun: He is a teacher at Sakura school.
Makoto: He is a staff of the city hall.

Oppoment's opinions
・Sakura school is an important place which old people can communicate with children.
・People who graduated from Sakura school will be very sad if Sakura school is closed.
・Momizi school is far from Sakura school, so it is hard to go to Momizi school for children of Sakura school.
・Theachers of Sakura school will lose their job.

Supporter's opinions
・Sakura school became very old, and it is dangerous for children.
・There is no many to rebuild Sakura school.
・There are few children at Sakura school. If  two school is merged, children will get many new friends.

The outcome of the discussion
They decided to merge two school. Students of Sakura school are going to go Momizi school by school bus. But they decided to leave the schoolhouse. And they are going to hold annual events at Sakura school.

My opinion:
I thought it was not clear how they treat teachers of Sakura school. They should decide that more clearly.

How effective I thought the discussion was and how it could have been better.
I thought they should show importance of the merger more. I couldn't understand  importance of the merger.